Unconstitutional Ordinances
by Kerry Thomas
August 19, 2003
Gregg Walker of the Lakeland Times hit it out of the
ballpark August 19 with his analysis of the Minocqua sign ordinance. But he didn't go quite far enough. There is a more fundamental question that
needs to be answered, namely, what legal power does any community have to tell
it's citizens what they can do with their own property, or with whom they can
freely transact business?
America's founding documents, the Declaration of
Independence and the Constitution, spell out the powers that We, the People,
have granted to our governments. Our
several States have all recognized these documents as the basis for our Laws,
and have adopted their own State Constitutions, as well.
When did We, the people, grant to our public servants
the power to tell us with whom we can transact business, or in what manner we
may do so?
If you own a piece of property and someone offers to
pay you to allow them to put a sign on your property, the two of you should be
able to negotiate a deal without the interference of a government
bureaucrat. The Uniform Commercial
Clause codifies this principle, and as long as the two of you are not engaged
in an illegal activity, you are free to conduct your business. Other people are free to either read your
sign or not, to heed the advertisement on your sign or to ignore it. If your sign design offends people, they are
free to not do business with you as a result.
If your creative sign atracts people to your business, that's what it's
supposed to do. If the color scheme of
your building offends people, they can choose not do business with you. If your color scheme is pleasing to people,
they can choose to do business with you.
It's called Freedom.
In America, all legal powers granted to any government
body must be specific in law. On the
federal level, these powers are spelled out in Article 1, Section 8 of our
Constitution. Other powers granted
lesser government bodies are spelled out in other state constitutions and
community charters. In America, We, the
People retain powers and rights not specifically granted our governments,
unlike communist countries, where all powers lie with the all-knowing
paternalistic State.
At least that's the way it's supposed to work.
We have allowed our public servants to enact practices
which appear to be laws, but which have no basis in law. We have allowed judges to make rulings and
issue orders which have no basis in law.
We have allowed our Rights to be usurped withour our consent, under the
guise of law. According to the Supreme
Court "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and
void." "An unconstitutional
act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no
protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as imoperative
as though it had never been passed."
"No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are
bound to enforce it."
A representative republic requires active
participation by it's Citizens in the governance of their affairs. We must be ever vigillant to safeguard and
secure our rights against those who would illegally usurp them from us.