When The GOP Get Behind Closed Doors

 

by Kerry Thomas

January 15, 2006

 

 

It’s that time of year.  Time to pull the boots out of the closet and put ‘em on.  It’s getting pretty deep around here.  No, not the snow.  I’m talking about the Republican rhetoric and double speak.

 

Like most storms, this one started innocuously enough.  Just a simple email sent out by a local Republican leader to his favorite supporters.  It spoke of recruiting one Tim Michels as a candidate to run against Senator Herb Kohl in this year’s Senate race in Wisconsin.

 

Now Tim Michels is a nice guy.  But he is the guy who lost the last Senate race against Russ Feingold in 2004, garnering about 44% of the votes in that race.  And so far he hasn’t announced any plans to run in this year’s race.

 

Meanwhile, there are three Republican candidates who have declared they will be candidates in 2006.  They are Marc Gumz, of Baraboo, Robert Gerald Lorge, of Bear Creek, and David Redick, of Madison.  These three candidates have their work cut out for them, as does any candidate in the Republican Senate race this year.  Herb Kohl’s had the past six years to accumulate campaign cash, in addition to his own personal money.

 

But this year’s Republican candidates have more to be concerned about than just their Democrat opponents.  This year’s Republican candidates also have to watch out for their own Party officials and what they’re up to behind closed doors.

 

Consider this from an email from Republican 8th Congressional District Chairman Bill Ross:  “Marc Gumz of Baraboo is best known for bad teeth and breath and using his farm to host the annual pot fest.  Robert Gerald Lorge of Bear Creek didn't get many votes last time and has the problem of the Lorge name.”

 

I also received this email from Vilas County Republican vice-Chair Jim Knuth: “I don't know David Redick, but the other two don't stand a chance and won't be backed by the Republican Party.”

 

Ross also had a few other interesting comments.  “Leaders have to be activists as I are the most informed.”  [That’s not a typo – that’s how he wrote it.]  “I have a good idea of who is a good candidate and who is not because of past training and experience.”

 

When I pointed out that this sounded like an elitist attitude, all he could respond with was “Are you a Democrat plant?  You certainly sound like it, complaining that we are a party of elitists.  That's the Democrat line.”  It might be, but it’s also becoming more and more clear.  GOP “leaders” like Bill Ross seem to think Republican candidates should be selected by (as he puts it) “our best informed Republicans.”

 

And this isn’t the only race where Republican “leaders” are maneuvering behind the scenes to position their anointed candidates at the head of the field.  All while insisting to the rest of us that the official Party line of neutrality and equal opportunity must be observed.  I guess some of our candidates are just more equal than others.

 

Consider for example this story from the January 14, 2006 edition of the Appleton Post-Crescent, written by Brian Tumulty from the Post-Crescent’s Washington bureau.  “The Wisconsin Republican Party already [has] given special permission to the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), which almost always remains neutral in GOP primaries, to support state Assembly Speaker John Gard of Peshtigo for the party's nomination.”  Gard is running for Congress in the 8th Congressional District, facing primary opponent Wisconsin Assemblywoman Terri McCormick.

 

When McCormick learned Friday [January 13] from a reporter about the arrangement, she was nearly speechless. "This goes beyond the boys' club," she said. "This goes to engineering an election and electioneering, trying to fix an election before the primary."

 

Tumulty’s story continues.  Gard already has locked up the support U.S. Rep. Mark Green (R-Hobart) to fill the seat Green is vacating to run for Wisconsin Governor, and that frees the national committee to back a candidate in the primary, committee spokesman Carl Forti said.”

 

"It's something that happens occasionally," Forti said Friday [January 13] evening.  "In a primary situation, it's difficult to get the Republican establishment behind a candidate.  In a case like this, where you have an exceptional candidate like John Gard, it's a little easier."

 

[And it didn’t take John Gard very long to cherry-pick this quote for his weekly e-newsletter, either.  That’s the only quote he used, completely ignoring the rest of the article that actually points out the very insider tactics Gard is using to garner his support among the GOP leadership.  Talk about chutzpah.]

 

“Although the NRCC is not yet officially backing Gard, Rep. Thomas Reynolds of New York, the group's chairman, has donated money from his political action committee to Gard's campaign.  And so have House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI).”

 

According to Tumulty’s article “McCormick was not told during her Friday [January 13] afternoon meeting at the organization's Washington headquarters that the state party had sent the NRCC permission to support Gard.  ‘They said they would be fair-minded,’ she said.”

 

For years I’ve listened to Republicans reiterate how the Party has to remain neutral in their primary elections.  All candidates are supposed to be treated equally.  It looks like some Republican candidates are just more equal than others this year.

 

The Republican Revolution that began with the election of President Ronald Reagan in 1980, and which was solidified with the Contract With America in 1994, has become arrogant with power.  The Republican leadership has become complacent.  They continue to promise smaller government, lower taxes and other conservative ideology.  But what they deliver is somewhat less than what they promise.

 

On the federal level, spending levels just keep rising, spending more and more of taxpayers’ money on everything imaginable.  The federal government has grown far beyond what is authorized by the Constitution, expanding into areas of our daily lives in ways that would make the Founding Fathers stage another Revolution.  Right here in Wisconsin we’ve had Republican control of either the Legislature or the Governorship for years.  Yet, State spending is through the roof.

 

We’re supposed to accept the Republican line that somehow lower than forecast increases in spending is the same as actual lower spending levels.  We’re supposed to accept that not raising taxes is the same as reducing taxes.

 

John Gard’s campaign website, for example, says he “has cut income, sales and property taxes.”  Really?  Year to year, has your property tax bill gone up or down?  The sales tax went from 4% statewide to 5% years ago.  This was supposed to be a temporary measure, to overcome huge budget deficits at the time.  It’s become permanent.  We’ve even added an additional 0.5% county sales tax in 58 of Wisconsin’s 72 counties, and added an additional 0.10% sales tax in a few more “Stadium Districts.”  (Click Here to see Wisconsin Department of Revenue Tax Rates.)  So where’s the “cut” in the sales tax?

 

Unchallenged statements like Gard’s play right into the perception that these career politicians are somehow “well qualified” to advance in their careers as professional politicians.

 

I come from a different school.  I go back to the Founders’ beliefs, that those who serve in public office should come with real world experience.  They should serve only a limited time in office, then return to the private sector.  There was never supposed to be a professional politicians class in society.  How times have changed.

 

Politics has become big business in America.  Along with the power has come corruption.  Principles have been compromised.  Those things that Republicans used to stand for have fallen aside, in the quest to retain control.  Absent are the new ideas.  Gone is innovation and creativity.  The leadership has been blinded by their absurd lust for power.  The classic back-room deals behind closed doors and no-record agreements between power brokers have infiltrated the Republican Party.

 

Charlie Rich would be proud.